A few months ago, in the end of 2005, I sent an email to Michael Haupt, ex friend and founder of the site threeworldwars.com
I wanted to denuntiate his progressive shift to a sect. As unfortunately expected, I had no answer, as it seems only people who send him adorations can receive answers, so I can't anymore...
When I think back, that a few years ago I offered to translate his whole site in French (btw, I did only two pages, and only 1 went online). Things hve changed a lot. Altough his site remained a good source of information, I'm tired with all his numerology and ads for his new sect...
Contents of the email sent 16nov 2005:
Dear Michael,
I was happy in the beginning of finding this site which uncovers many lies of history and of mass media.
it was giving anwsers to real problems.
it was giving anwsers to real problems.
but little by little, you started to talk about "paranormal" things (influences of numbers on events, etc) and some "magic" books and recipes to lead ones lifes.
Altough you pretend you are not taking part for any religion, all your teachings more and more prove to be what we call "protestant" = people who think they can deal directly with God, yes a christian one, but without the need of any church.
You probably think you are going in the right way and helping others. Unlike probably many emails you receive, I'll not discuss about which religion has the truth. I'll rather point you to one important point:
in the new book you promote (and i guess there is commercial $$ under all of this; you became more and more greedy and 3WW became filled with ads and google ads over the years), it says JC is in the 5th dimension etc... All of this added with "magical" recipes like "omega point" and other strange, unproven, non-scientifical stuff, makes that this book is another book that promises you a recipe, but above all makes his authors richer !
So, it cannot be called a sect because there is no religious point (well not completely at least), but in a way it is a sect in wich you are entering, because it promises freedom and good life only thru HUMAN ways, when a real christian leans on God;
So, it cannot be called a sect because there is no religious point (well not completely at least), but in a way it is a sect in wich you are entering, because it promises freedom and good life only thru HUMAN ways, when a real christian leans on God;
freedom, true life, and all this stuff is a freemason propaganda. And here is my point: you think you are fighting against this NWO and uncovering it.
But "your" book promotes a vision of the world in which all religions are united and find a new way of having an happy life. Altough I'm sure you do not promote euthanasia, abortions, riots and controlled media (so you are not part of the NWO), you give a solution which they like;
But "your" book promotes a vision of the world in which all religions are united and find a new way of having an happy life. Altough I'm sure you do not promote euthanasia, abortions, riots and controlled media (so you are not part of the NWO), you give a solution which they like;
this is because you do not seem to understand that the goal of this NWO is not to destroy humanity. but it is to establish a satanic reign on earth, hence their hatred against catholics!
(you notice the NWO is especially anti catholic, and much less against other christians);
(you notice the NWO is especially anti catholic, and much less against other christians);
if you want just a piece of explanation, i'll remind you what happenend to the cath church in the 60s: a revolution called vatican2. That is the key of all recent events, of why the catholicity is going in a wrong direction and supporting the NWO since about 40 years.
I wish we could discuss more about this, about how this revolution is preparing the world government, and how it explains the U.N role, freemasons' logic, etc..
If you don't answer me, I'll be forced to unsubscribe from your newsletter, and create another site to explain all of this. Because 3WW is not anymore what it was in the beginning. You've changed, Michael, and the influence of those people is not good !
The fact they provide answers to everything, is NOT a proof that their answers are true !! your problem is that you want to find a global explanation, but we are humans, we CANT understand the full plan of God. Every situation is different and there is no book, no omega point or whatever which will be a "key" to your life.
The fact they provide answers to everything, is NOT a proof that their answers are true !! your problem is that you want to find a global explanation, but we are humans, we CANT understand the full plan of God. Every situation is different and there is no book, no omega point or whatever which will be a "key" to your life.
I hope to have news from you.
All the Best
Thomas
All the Best
Thomas
par Thomas Delerm
publié dans :
Infos sur le blog
Le PS par la voix de F.Hollande ose critiquer le gouvernement pour ses dépenses et sa gestion de la dette. Il semble oublier que les gouvernement socialiste, entre 1997 et 2002, malgré une croissance énorme, a continué d'accroitre les dépenses de l'état et d'augmenter la dette.
Pour rétablir la vérité, voir les chiffres officiels de l'INSEE:
Tableau 1.606a - Dette au sens de Maastricht
| Milliards d'euros et % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Source : Comptes nationaux - Base 2000, Insee | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Mise à jour le 10 août 2005 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
On voit sur ce tableau (http://www.insee.fr/fr/indicateur/cnat_annu/base_2000/principaux_resultats/htm/t_1606a.htm) que la dette de l'état a cru en moyenne de 20 milliard par an entre 1998 et 2001, et même de 60 milliards en 2002, année dont le budget a été voté et aussi en partie éxécuté par le PS.
Alors entendre le PS dire "La politique qui a été menée depuis 2002 a consisté à augmenter le déficit public, à laisser filer la dépense, y compris en matière de sécurité sociale et enfin à relever le niveau de l'endettement de notre pays. Paradoxalement, ça a été une période où on a baissé les impots des plus privilégiés" (AP, 15 décembre 2005, http://fr.news.yahoo.com/15122005/5/francois-hollande-critique-les-baisses-d-impots-financees-par-l.html), c'est vraiment n'importe quoi.
"Laisser filer la dépense" qu'il dit... mais il oublie que pour ne pas tenir compte de la croissance, qui augmente les recettes et donc réduit le déficit, il faut voir le taux d'augmentation des dépenses, hors inflation. En négligeant l'inflation qui est restée stable autour de 2% chaque année, on constate ici http://www.insee.fr/fr/indicateur/cnat_annu/base_2000/principaux_resultats/htm/t_1607.htm que les dépenses ont cru de 3.98% par an entre 1998 et 2002 (16.9% en 4ans) et de 7.94% entre 2002 et 2004, soit 3.90% par an, ce qui est inférieur... (et l'augmentation 2005 sera aux environs de 3% encore une fois).
voir aussi les données de la dette au format Français: http://www.aft.gouv.fr/IMG/pdf/050426_Dette_encours_2004.pdf
Pour voir à plus long terme depuis 1978: http://www.aft.gouv.fr/aft_fr_23/dette_etat_24/series_historiques_112/administrations_publiques_114/index.html
de déc 98 à déc 2002, officiellement 6.7% (en réalité environ 12% pour les biens de consommation courante, "effet euro".. mais cela ne peut être pris en compte car nous utilisons des chiffres officiels).
de déc 2002 à déc 2004: +4.6 points soit +4.31%
Conclusion:
PS, en 4 ans (fin 1998-2002), hausse des dépenses hors inflation: 10.2% (2.46%/an)
UMP, en 2 ans (fin 2002-2004), hausse des dépenses hors inflation: 3.63% (1.80%/an)
Vous en déduisez vous-mêmes, qui ment, du PS ou de l'UMP..
par Thomas Delerm
publié dans :
Infos sur le blog
En dehors de l'éternel débat sur lequel des grand moteurs de recherche (Google, Yahoo, MSN) ou des petits (Exalead, dir.com, AskJeeves, Altavista...) a le plus d'indexation / le plus si on exclut les sites de spam/ ou les résultats les plus pertinents, on peut aussi s'interroger sur la méthode d'interrogation (paramètres, fonctions pour trier les résultats, etc...)
En ce qui concerne le tri c'est facile, l'utilisateur n'a aucun pouvoir de trier par date de MAJ, par taille, par une combinaison de critères quelconques, ses résultats. Et ca c'est nul...
Mais en plus, parfois il est IMPOSSIBLE de faire comprendre au moteur sa question. Voici en exemple ci dessous un mail de plainte que j'ai adressé à Google à ce sujet : (bon c'est en Anglais désolé)
Bonjour,
(I know google works in english, so here it is in english)
It is not possible to search for some keywords.
On top of the fact that sometimes, common words are "deleted" by google (like "de", so that expressions like "point de vue" become incomplete), also the special characters are not taken into account.
This is REALLY annoying. I'm a developer and if I look for example at an information about what the "@" symbol is used for in XSL, I have no way to search for this in Google.
It is not possible to search for some keywords.
On top of the fact that sometimes, common words are "deleted" by google (like "de", so that expressions like "point de vue" become incomplete), also the special characters are not taken into account.
This is REALLY annoying. I'm a developer and if I look for example at an information about what the "@" symbol is used for in XSL, I have no way to search for this in Google.
That's a big issue I think. I hope you'll deal with it and at least provide a way of forcing some search terms in the advanced page.
Thanks for all this great site
Thomas
Thomas
ps: and this option would improve the quality of results. If we put common words in the requests, it is often because we KNOW they are useful !!
par Thomas Delerm
publié dans :
Infos sur le blog
Aujourd'hui je transfère tous les articles de mon ancien Blog de Spiritoo vers ce nouveau blog de Spiritoo. L'ancien blog ne sera plus mis à jour, son design était trop moche (impossible de changer l'agencement des colonnes, la colonne de texte est toute petite au milieu même sur un grand écran...).
De plus les blogs Typepad n'offrent des options de personnalisation satisfaisantes que dans leurs versions payantes. Je pensais que le blog m'étant proposé par 9telecom (mon fournisseur d'accès), il serait plus avantageux mais il n'en a rien été.
Vive Over-Blog !!
par Thomas Delerm
publié dans :
Infos sur le blog
Bonjour
Et bienvenue sur mon nouveau blog, j'ai laissé tomber Typepad qui était vraiment trop mauvais et je suis passé sur OverBlog
Je vais maintenant recopier les articles venant de typepad et écrits depuis avril
Thomas Delerm alias Spiritoo
par Thomas Delerm
publié dans :
Infos sur le blog